Misconceptions on Islam
S.K. Balasubramanian
Misconceptions on Islam
There are a number of misconceptions on Islam. The civilized
world particularly the west, has a glorified image of Islam. The
following were my comments on the subject in a recent seminar on
the subject in Pune.
1. Debate was allowed in early Islam
The Islamists who advocated debate and believed that theological
questions could be settled by debate were known as "Muttazil"
( I am not sure of the exact name.) They preached only in Egypt.
They were persecuted and one section took refuge in Tamil Nadu
where they were known as Marakkayars. I came to know about the
background of this community only about six months ago. They have
their own Madrassas and do not mix with the other Muslims. After
their expulsion, debate was violently suppressed in Islamic
countries. Instances of innocent sufis being put to death have
been recorded just because they claimed a direct relationship
with God.
2. Islam had a tradition of scholarship
A participant cited the case of al-Beruni. He was a Persian with
an Arabic name. This supports my contention that the we cannot
conclude anything from names. Further al-Beruni's work was a
sycophantic praise of the ruling dynasty. Whatever poetic merit
was there, the work could not have had intellectual depth for the
simple reason it was debasement of poetry for mercenary ends.
The modern equivalent would be someone writing Sonia Vamsham. The
administration of Islamic lands was in the hands of Persians
supported by Jews. The Arabs retained their tribal culture and
never bothered about intellectual pursuits.
3. Islam preserved the ancient European classics and passed them
on to the renaissance Europeans
I had said that the Jews of Spain were the ones who were
responsible for creating such awareness in Europe of its
classical past. The evidence for this idea is as follows. The
library in Alexandria, or whatever was left of the library after
Christian vandalism, was destroyed by the Muslims. The argument
was advanced that the Koran was all embracing and the world does
not need any other book or knowledge.
Emperor Frederick III (around 1200 AD) occupies a peculiar place
in history. When his father died he was too young and the Pope
was his guardian. He turned out to be a person of great wile and
guile and was excommunicated for not pursuing the crusade he had
promised to the Pope. He held court in Sicily and entertained
Arabs and Jews in his court. He knew the non-Christian view of
Christianity and had scant respect for the Pope.
After the excommunication edict, he decided to redeem his pledge
and went on a farcical crusade. He was received in a friendly
manner by the Egyptian Sultan and treated with respect as an
honored guest. Frederick III enjoyed life in Egypt for six months.
As a mark of his regard for the Emperor, the Sultan gave
Jerusalem to the Christians. Frederick III returned to Sicily,
Jerusalem in his pocket, without firing a single arrow.
If the Egyptian Muslims or the Jews were aware of the European
classical knowledge Frederick should have brought the same to the
notice of European scholars. There was no evidence that he did so
or that the eastern Jews were aware of ancient Greece in any
depth or were interested in such knowledge.
That is why I presumed a key role for the Jews in Spain. The
classical knowledge came into European possession after the Moors
were expelled from Spain.
4. "Islamic architecture"
My comment on architecture was based on information in a 1989
book: "India Rediscovered" by Kealy. It was there I
found that Islam has no treatise on architecture comparable to
Vastu Shastra. One does not have to accept everything in Vaastu.
Even after the abstract elements are ignored, there would still
be a science of building techniques. This is what is lacking in
Islam.
The same author cites English archeologists of the last century
to say that the Qutub should be a Hindu structure. The vijaya
stamba is a Hindu tradition. The iron pillar at the site is also
pre-Islamic. A friend showed us a video of the systematic removal
of the Hindu carvings in a Mosque in side the Qutub Minar. The
British author says the arch is a Hindu feature. So is the dome.
The central dome in the Taj surrounded by four smaller ones is
also a feature of the Hindu tradition. It was known as
pancharatna. The author goes on to say that in the 18th century
belief amongst the British archeologists was that the Taj must
have been built by Hindu artisans trained in the tradition of the
Hindu architecture who built the Gol Gumbaz.
The Garbha griha of all southern temples have decorated domes
over them. The two exclusive elements of Islamic architecture are
thus shown to be non-Islamic in origin.
5. The "inferiority complex"
Regarding "inferiority complex", as I said, it exists
in the minds of the Indian middle class educated in English. What
should not be forgotten is that Hindu society is the only society
that stopped Islam in its tracks. All other Islamic societies are
today 100 % Muslim. People who speak of Hindu inferiority look at
the 30% that became Muslim in India. I look at the same picture
and say that 70% retained their individuality. The resilience of
Hinduism had been overlooked.
The role of Buddhism in sapping the vitality of our society has
to be looked into objectively. Buddha was a great individual but
his (?) social prescription to ignore external evil was
disastrous for morale. Malaysia and Indonesia fell because they
were Buddhist. It may be a coincidence but the only non-Muslim
part of Indonesia, the Bali island, is Hindu.
6. Hindu Military "inferiority"
Military inferiority of Hindus is another aspect on which we have
to do rethinking. Hindus also had been blamed for not adopting
newer techniques of warfare. As I said there had been six
incursions into India over seven hundred years. It is not likely
that border incursions were limited to this number. So the
occasions when we won had been ignored and only our failures are
highlighted. The Hindu military genius was reflected in Shivaji's
achievements.
It was another matter that our defeats had disastrous
consequences which were due to the tribalism of the attackers.
Often we did not repay them in kind. That was our culture. China
also suffered from tribal attacks which was why the Great Wall
was built and manned. Roman empire too paid a price to tribalism
on its borders. In the third century Rome had as many as thirty
"tyrants" ruling over the land in one century.
7. The cultural difference
The basic difference in the Hindu and Islamic approach lies in
their attitude to wealth. The Hindu insists on creative processes.
In Islam misappropriation, plunder, perfidy and persecution
derive sanction from the example of Mohammed. The example of the
Management of the BCCI bank is a typical case of Islamic culture
of deceit. Besides there is the case of Asli Nadir, a British
Muslim " business magnate" who now evades arrest for
commercial crimes by living in the Turkish part of Cyprus. The
economic crimes in Iran, Indonesia and other countries are all
part of Islamic behavior. Even in India more than half of the
criminal class is drawn from Muslims.
There is more objective evidence on the clutural difference.
Hindus and Muslims from the subcontinent emigrated to Britain at
the same time in the period 1950- 62. In those days the
Commonwealth citizens could travel without restrictions to
England. The Hindus and the Muslims started at the same level of
poverty. After fifty years the difference between the communities
is telling. The Hindus are amongst the foremost sections of
British population, in wealth, social status and education. The
Muslims are way down at the lowest levels.
8. Islam - A humanistic religion
There have been attempts by discerning Muslims to white wash
Islam's nature and present it as a humanistic religion. Akbar
Ahmed, a Pakistani living in England, propagates the view that
the western media is prejudiced against Islam.
A recent article by Maulana Wahiuddin Khan in the Times of India
says that the Prophet participated only in three wars. This
statement is a total distortion of what is known about Mohammed's
life. He was responsible for the first expeditions of plunder and
loot. He laid down by his personal example the principles of
"Islamic warfare". He personally ordered the massacre
of the Jews. He did not participate in some wars because several
missions of loot were undertaken at the same time.